AAAAARRRGHHHHHH!!!

Being a woman fucking sucks. Every single fucking aspect of being female is so unbelievable shitty compared to being a guy. We really got the worst fucking part of that bargain when they dished out functionality. Let's take a closer look shall we:

Female Bodies generally - weaker, slower.

Reproductive organs - we're crippled by out overly sensitive shitty female reproductive organs which totally fuck us up both physically and emotionally. Damn never ending periods crippling us with pain and discomfort, not to mention the fact that there's a fucking blood bath all the god damn time. When was the last time you bleed all over your clothes, sofa, bed? And not like a cute little nose bleed, oh no some fucking shameful stupid vagina bleeding. And then the BV, the thrush, the urine infections, the painful sex... endless issues with the damn thing
Boy reproductive organs? Only thing of concern - size.

Hormones - all over the god damn place all the god damn time, unbelievable frustrating
Boy hormones? Aggression - seen as a positive in all aspects of society, got you where you are today!

Clothes - uncomfortable tight motherfucking body revealing bullshit. And if I don't dress that way I'm judged as something else (dyke, tomboy, not feminine) . I have to dress that way in order for people to see beyond my clothes and see me.
Boy clothes? Comfortable and practical with enough pocket space to carry all your necessities

Hair - long bullshit fucking hair that needs to be washed and conditioned and styled, cut, colored.
Boy haircuts? Short minimal effort required. Wake up walk out.

Face - the endless cycle of make up, cleansing, toning, scrubbing, peeling, plucking....
Boy face routine? Wake up and walk out, optional shave

Grooming - from head to toe there is not a part of my body that I am not meant to groom in someway, Hair, face, hair under my arms, on my arms, stupid shitty vagina, legs, all over my stupid body I need to remove the stupid har, nails on my hands and on my toes the list goes on and on and on..
Boy grooming? Wake up and walk out, optional face shave.

As a man you will NEVER be judged by the way you look. It's so fucking easy for guys to go "just don't put make up on then if it's so expensive and time consuming, don't bother with all that crap", oh really, if I was to cut my hair in a no-styling needed cut, wear loose fitted comfortable clothes, stop shaving my arm pits and my legs, stop wearing make up I would be treated the same way as I am now? Exactly, so shut the fuck up. When was the last time you didn't get a job because they way you look? I am judged for my exterior and my exterior only as soon as I step outside the fucking house.

AND ON TOP OF THIS SHIT we have to deal with you motherfucking assholes. You degrade us, you molest us, you assault us, you discriminate against us. FUCK YOU. You should worship the fucking ground we walk on, we already have the shittier end of the deal physically and mentally. And you still have the audacity to treat us this way? How fucking dare you.

I want a sex change. Fuck this female bullshit. If I had been born a man I would be richer, healthier happier. Fact.

Democracy?

So the Tories in response to UKIP's success and losing people and votes to UKIP are responding by adopting UKIP policy. How the fuck does that work? If anything this is an apparent display of how democracy in this country is fucked and means nothing. What happens when people who used to vote Tory start voting Labour because they are finding this new UKIP line disgusting? Then what you gonna do? Change your policies again? What the fuck do you actually stand for?

You’re meant to have parties representing different views and ways of governing the country, they promote these views and the people decide which one they like the best. The parties are driven by a conviction that their way is the best way possible to run the country and that is they motivation behind the policy. Modern democracy however does not work in this way, modern democracy is driven by personal achievement and power. Moderns, developed countries with a free and independent media (questionable if that actually exists anymore but anyways), freedom of speech, a vibrant civil society and a functioning judiciary do not need voting and democratically elected government. That society needs a governing body with long term goals and real dedication of running and furthering infrastructure, societal services (education, healthcare etc) and society as a hole. People who are "governing" with a short term personal objective are not going to be able to do that. 

These countries should be run like companies, with a board of directors (da people) and executives running and executing shit. With checks and balances which don't result in a change in the senior management every 4 years where they spend the majority of the time worrying and scheming and plotting in order to hold on to their seats rather than actually doing some work. 

Imaging if you were running a company the way you run the country, you'd think it insane. The CEO and senior management can be voted out by staff, so instead of focusing on doing what's best for the company they are focusing on pleasing staff so that they will vote for them. How does that work? Yes you may think that the staff would vote for the people who are doing a wonderful job increasing profits and efficiency but that's probably not in the interest of the individual staff member. They will vote for the person who is giving them the most time off and the most money, which may not be in the interest of the company as a whole but what the fuck do they care. 

Is this really how we should be operating a country? 

Sverigedemokraterna i ett nötskal

I don’t usually write in Swedish but this is a post about Sweden and so it will be written in its language.

Jag läste detta reportage idag och det var ett väldigt insiktsgivande stycke om människor som röstat pa SD.

Emelie och Sebastian bor på en ort med 800 invånare.

Emelie gick barn och fritid och Sebastian slutade skolan efter nian.

Emelie vikarier som personlig assistent och på en pizzeria och Sebastian praktiserar som vaktmästare och får aktivitetstöd.

“Jag är absolut inte rasist. Jag jobbar på en pizzeria med utländska personer. Men jag tycker att det borde vara mer full fokus på oss. Arbetskamraterna på pizzerian har berättat om sin bakgrund. Hon inser att många haft det svårt. Jag tycker synd om dem, jag tycker att det är förfärligt. Samtidigt tycker jag: vi kan ju inte ens hjälpa alla här i Sverige. Jag är väldigt kluven där.”

Emelie kanner sig inte trygg sen asylboendet oppnades; det satt män utanfor affären en kväll och dom skrattade och busvisslade – ”jag kände mig jatteobekväm”

Sebastian sager att “Jag tror folk stör sig mest på att det är så lätt för dem att komma hit och få allt de vill ha. Eller inte allt de vill ha, men de får fina barnvagnar, hjälp till körkort, boende och mat. Framför allt ungdomar som har haft det lite jobbigt stör sig på sånt”

Ironin i att två människor som ej tagit tillvara pa den utbildning som givits dem gratis OCH som båda arbetar inom omsorg tycker att felet och anledning till att dom är arbetslosa och outbildade ligger i att det i ett vinstdrivande syfte oppnades ett asylboende på orten är ju helt otrolig.  

Emelie och Sebastian klagar på att det finns dåligt med jobb, och det är dålig kvalite på skolan och äldreomsorgen, deras lösning för att få bättre kvalitet på skola och omsorg och skapa fler jobb på landsbygden är att sluta ta emot flyktingar.

Eftersom varken Emelie eller Sebastian vet någonting om ekonomiska principer, eller hur ett lands ekonomi går runt så forstår jag hur dom kanske kan dra den slutsatsen. Att det blir bättre kvalitet på det samhallet erbjuder dess invånare och det blir fler jobb desto mindre människor det finns i samhället.

Sverigedemokraterna är partiet för mindre vetande bortskämda människor. Måste ha detta i åtanke, man får börja med att förklara hur saker och ting fungerar, fakta. Det är ingen poäng att argumentera, dom förstår inte ens vad vi andra pratar om.

Next Level Ultra Stupid

Like seriously. Reading this article on The Guardian about ultra stupid men who delay flights because they can't sit next to women. Apparently someone interpreted a book in way which made these men believe that sitting next to women on a commercial airline means you're a bad person or something. As a result they once they get on board start asking women to move the fuck out of the way.

There's stupidity and then there's stupidity that just infuriating.

IF YOU CAN'T BE AROUND WOMEN STAY THE FUCK AT HOME or buy two seats, or reserve your seats in advance with a pal?

Holy mo if anyone dared come at me with that bullshit. You be wishing you were in hell already.

Swedish Racists

What gets me about Swedish racist is the fact that they have absolutely no reason to be that way, it’s nothing but an ignorant choice.

Obviously being racist is a choice whoever you are and wherever you live but you still have to put that racism into context, place it within that particular culture and society. Indian’s who don’t want their daughters marrying someone of a lower caste (or Muslims, blacks or whites for that matter..) have had it ingrained in their culture and in their society that that is the way it should be and everyone thinks that way. American white racism against the black and Hispanic population should be viewed in the context of slavery and Latin American immigration. Israel and Palestine, Jews and Muslim etc. There’s a long standing historical context to the racism in these cases, it’s still fucking stupid and disgusting and ignorant but it has context that can to some extent explain it.

There is no historical context for racism in Sweden. There is no century long battles between religion, there’s been no forced combination of two countries or races or anything. The make-up of the Swedish population consists of people born there and refugees. That’s it. The foreigners in Sweden are there because they have fled wars. Sure there’s your odd EU immigrant as well but it’s mainly asylum seekers. Who we should take the utmost care to look after and treat with respect and love and kindness. Because we can.

There has been no hardship in Sweden for centuries, the normal 17th-18th century poverty and that but that’s it. Sweden has never suffered under a dictator or terror or oppression. EVER. Swedes have no idea what it’s like to live in a country where any bit of their life is infringed. There is all the societal freedoms you can think of, you will always have food to eat and water to drink, you will always have a roof over your head, you will always have access to education and health care.

So when you who have suffered no real hardship in life (comparable to those you think less worthy) you have NO right to be a dick to others. You should be grateful you have been so lucky in life and extend whatever you can to those who haven’t been so lucky, which in its most basic form comes to not thinking people of a different skin colour or country origin are less than you.

The immigrants and refugees in Sweden are not  a threat to you. They are not taking your jobs or your women. They are not costing society trillions. They are not even there because they necessarily want to. Which makes your racism against them so much worse because you have zero need to be that way. Nothing in your societal context calls for even the smallest hint of racism.  

But the absolute worst part of the ignorant racists in Sweden is the fact that they feel entitled to feel that way. They feel they can justify it, they waive it around like proud badge of honour. Which makes it so much more disgusting and heart breaking. Unfortunately it’s also a consequence of the non-troublesome society we have created – people lose their sense of empathy and hatred starts to grow when you cannot fill your life with meaning. 

Abortion

This post has been quite some time in the making. I just get so angry and upset every time I read something or start writing. But here it goes (there will be a follow up on this which was written whilst somewhat intoxicated I just have to edit it somewhat first, think there might have been more swear words than actual text, but shows just how strongly I feel about this).


Few things make me angry, frustrated, sad and pissed off to the very core of my being as anti abortion and the fact that abortions are illegal and that there are people in the world that believe that abortions should never take place. The idea to me of living in a country where abortion was not a possibility would fill me with fear, and I would most certainly be a very active lobbyist. 

There's three aspects of anti abortion ideology that gets to me. Firstly, I cannot understand how people can have such strong views on the life and actions of whats happening with someone else's body; secondly, that societies and the legislature think it's acceptable to legislate about my body, and subsequently removing my ability to make decisions about my body; and thirdly men with views on abortion, seriously wtaf, just shhh.   

Let's start with the third one. As man you have a choice of walking away from the consequences of your actions in the case of a pregnancy. You have a super simply, easy breezy choice to just say 'nah don't want that shit, don't need that shit, can't deal with that shit' and simply walk away and that would be all. Women do not have that choice. Becoming pregnant is a two person job; dealing with the consequences (regardless of decision to follow through or not with the pregnancy) falls entirely on just one of those two people. And as a man you have absolutely no way of relating to what happens, you can in no way relate to hormonal surges that leave you completely fucked over by your own inexplicable emotions, to boobs so sore you can't walk without being in pain, to the tiredness, the aches, the pains, the fact that there is a life form forming inside of you and living off you, not to mention the process of getting the thing out. And I'm sorry but on the topic of pregnancy and abortion, your views are secondary and you should only be saying 'whatever she says'. 

The second and third issue about people in general and society as whole and the legislature getting involved frankly is beyond me. What is being asked of women when abortions are denied is a horrendous intrusion of women's human rights. It is giving politicians and activists the power over something that will never concern them personally. How can you so vehemently oppose me doing something that a) has no impact on your life what so ever and b) would ensure my physical and mental well-being isn't jeopardized, not to mention would change my entire life forever. How people can have such abnormally strong feelings about something growing inside of me that you feel that it requires statute to protect is beyond me. 

You are basically are saying that you and the state should have a greater power to decide over my body and what's growing inside of me (and not only growing inside of me but dependent on me for survival) than I do.

People who argue that as soon as there is a heartbeat or a nervous system or whatever attribute you want to give the fetus, there is a human life capable of protection by the law contrary to the wishes of the person that that fetus is dependent on for survival, frankly baffles me because it's an argument completely detached from reality. If you could take a fetus out of me and stick it in somewhere else and it develops and becomes a human and is raised by someone else then sure that argument has some weight. If that was the case then sure you could argue that I am by choice terminating something that could become a child without any regard for the impact on me them woman/mother as a person. But that's not how it works.

This is how it works: Two people have sex, one of them becomes pregnant, cells starts multiplying inside of that body having a physical and mental impact on that person over and above what any non pregnant person can imagine. Those cells then require 9 months to fully form into a baby. The woman then has to go through a life threatening physical trauma for that baby to exit her body. Then there is a child in the world that is entirely dependent on a capable adult for survival. So the argument about a fetus being a human protectable by law, independently from the woman it's growing inside of, the second a sperm hits an egg is entirely void of the notion that 

a) it cannot ever be detached and survive from that specific woman required for it to exist in the first place 

b) a potentially life threatening and most certainly physically altering child birth by that woman is required and 

c) someone needs to look after the damn thing when it comes out or it will die in matter of hours/days

What these people also seem to be missing the point on is that denying me an abortion doesn't save the fetus or the child. I could go on and take heroin everyday for the rest of the pregnancy leaving the child completely disfigured, I could go on and neglect and abuse that child. Making it illegal for me to abort the fetus changes nothing. People who compare abortions to killing babies fundamentally do not understand the difference about a fetus growing inside a woman and a random kid on the street.

I think these two articles very much shows the importance of letting the decision to give up your body and creating a child should in all and every instance be entirely up to the woman in question and no one else, any thing but it just horrific.

A pregnant, suicidal rape victim fought Ireland's new abortion law. The law won

Justice for Savita

Guardian Comments on Sexism

As per my usual lunch break routine I started reading the Guardian online today and ended up on this article on 10 common comments on feminist blog posts, written by the woman who started the Everyday Sexism Project. Well worth a read she makes some really good points firmly stored in the 'come back' section for future reference. I then ended up in a lovely link click spiral and started reading this article on comment sections on articles about female issues, also very much worth a read. That then lead me to this article on 10 sexist scenarios in the work place. I clicked on the link reference because in the previous article it had stated that that piece has attracted "some of the worst comments the moderators had seen" such as this "Oh God, another dose of petty feminist whinging from the Graun. Must be that time of the month. When has the guardian's unfounded 'sexism' diatribes ever been about the 'boys?' Whether it's domestic violence articles that ignore the 40% male victims, studies on single parents that are based only on mothers or the complete absence of serious studies on, say, the much higher suicide rates among certain categories of men or the ordeal of single fathers in our incredibly biased court system." 

Going into the comments on that article about sexist scenarios in the work place I notice A LOT of them have been removed.. sadly not all of them. I have not been this horrified at the men in this country for a while but I guess it was a good reminder at just how astonishingly fucking disgusting they are. 

There's a gem of a man commenting on this thread called NeilPeel here's some of his more enlightened contributions to the debate on sexism 

"How about we accept that men and women are different and realise that some people are assholes and should be dealt with appropriately - rather than splitting into this women vs men crap that the Guardian frequently drum up for click bait?"

"If you're happy to take it, they are going to keep dishing it out."

I could go on but I just couldn't take it any more. Why why why why why and how more importantly is it possible for you as a human being, when presented with evidence of reoccurring problems for a certain group of people in the society that you live in, to respond with not only doubt of the problems existing in the first place, but also respond with such disrespect towards the people face by such problems? By disrespecting and belittling those  who are experiencing these problems you are in fact acknowledging that they exist. So if you are able to comprehend that these events do occur and occur on a frequent basis then WHY would you have a need to say that the reactions to those problems are inappropriate? 

Is it not up to the person involved to determine the appropriate reaction? Do you not have a responsibility as a member of society to respect others? If I act in a certain way or say something to someone who subsequently is offended or feels abused by my actions, who should make an adjustment? Surely the person acting or saying something would suffer less of a loss by a change in behavior than the person who is offended/abused.

I know what's wrong with these men, both those who ask me to organise their meetings and those who don't see it as a problem. Unfortunately for society at large they are incapable of seeing the world from any other perspective than the small view point they have. They are ignorant. And for that I feel sorry for them. I also think we should send them to Syria. Because I cannot deal with this level of stupidity surrounding me, I'm on my period for fucks sake.